How Long to Wait Before Having Another Baby
For older mothers, it can feel like there'south petty time to waste before trying for some other kid. Simply at that place are existent risks linked to getting pregnant again too soon. Lauren Bates/Getty Images hide caption
toggle caption
Lauren Bates/Getty Images
For older mothers, it can feel like there's little fourth dimension to waste material earlier trying for some other child. But there are real risks linked to getting pregnant once again too soon.
Lauren Bates/Getty Images
Sign up for the CommonHealth newsletter to receive a weekly digest of WBUR'south best wellness, medicine and science coverage.
Many older start-time moms face a dilemma when it comes to baby No. two. The clock is ticking louder than ever. But doctors suggest waiting at to the lowest degree a year and a half after giving nascency before conceiving over again.
This is the standard advice, based on multiple studies and public health guidelines. Just deciding when to effort again tin can be a hard decision — weighing medical take chances confronting infertility risk. Now there are some new data points to cistron in. A paper published Monday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine analyzed medical records from well-nigh 150,000 Canadian pregnancies to tease out how a female parent's age influences the effects of a shorter-than-recommended interval between pregnancies.
For older moms in a bustle, the bad news is that the report adds evidence that conceiving inside 12 months of a birth does mean heightened health risks for both mother and child. But epidemiologist Laura Schummers, who led the enquiry while at Harvard and is now a post-doctoral fellow at the University of British Columbia, says there'due south good news for you hither every bit well:
"The optimal spacing window that we found was one to 2 years afterward the delivery of one child until the conception of the next pregnancy," she says. "That's when we found the lowest risk for both mothers and babies." And, she adds, that's short compared to some previous studies that had suggested the optimal wait was betwixt xviii months and upwards to five years.
Past research has establish a articulate link between brusque "interpregnancy intervals" and increased hazard of health problems for mother and baby, including premature nascence. But why? The debate, Schummers says, revolves around whether the brusk interval is a direct biological cause of the risks, or whether it it is itself a result of other forces at work in the mother's life — for example, a lack of access to health care and unintended pregnancies.
Considering older women are likelier to programme their pregnancies and have better access to intendance, Schummers and colleagues hypothesized that those mothers would not incur as much risk as younger women do if they had babies shut together.
They institute out they were wrong.
"In fact," Schummers says, "we found that there were risks of adverse infant outcomes for women of all ages.
"The risks to the babies were college among younger women, which was consistent with the team's hypothesis. But risks to the mothers were higher amid older women — indeed, but older mothers incurred higher risks to their own health past getting significant again and then soon.
After accounting for other factors that could drive these numbers, Schummers says, the stats milk shake out like this:
• For women 35 years or older who conceived just half dozen months after a birth, six.2 per thousand experienced serious affliction or injury, including death. Wait xviii months and that take a chance dropped to 2.6 per per yard. So, small absolute numbers merely a dramatic deviation.
• A "severe agin baby outcome" includes stillbirth and existence built-in very early or very small. Among women ages xx to 34, those who conceived later on just six months had 20 babies per thousand with those severe outcomes; the risk drops to 14 per yard among those who waited eighteen months.
• Amid women 35 years or older, in that location were 21 astringent baby outcomes per g among those who waited just vi months; the risk drops to 18 per thousand among those who waited eighteen months.
"This shows y'all both the relationship between pregnancy spacing and the increased risk," Schummers says, "but also that older women tend to have a higher baseline gamble of many of these outcomes at all pregnancy spacing lengths."
The inquiry turned up a like pattern for premature birth: A brusque pregnancy interval raises the risk for all women, just particularly for younger women. The risk for them dropped from 53 per thousand at a six-month interval to 32 per k at an 18-calendar month interval. For women over 35, the risk dropped from fifty per thousand at six months to 36 per 1000 afterward 18 months.
It seems similar common sense that a adult female's body may need more than half-dozen months to fully recover from building a baby and giving nativity, but the actual mechanism behind the risks of short pregnancy intervals is not fully clear.
The leading theory, Schummers says, is that nutrients like fe or folate could be depleted in the female parent's body. But more than research is needed to see if that theory holds in developed countries like the United states and Canada, or if at that place are other mechanisms that have not yet been identified.
For now, she says, her team hopes these new findings tin assistance women make decisions within their own personal contexts, and in consultation with their medical teams. The data may be particularly helpful for older women, she says, considering they more than frequently decide to have short pregnancy intervals on purpose.
"And so if you're making that kind of conclusion on purpose," she says, "information technology'south easier to say, 'You know, let's expect some other iii months.' "
How Long to Wait Before Having Another Baby
Source: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/11/01/663181674/how-long-should-older-moms-wait-before-getting-pregnant-again